This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
The new name Missile vehicle is nothing more than a Redirect to Combat vehicle, which is not covering missile vehicles. The History of Missile vehicle shows only one entry. When I tried to make the Move myself, I was told automatically I could not make the move since a page with that name already exists. I believe previously such moves could be made if the target page is merely a Redirect page. If an administrator does not want to make this move, should I copy and paste to make this move myself ? H Padleckas (talk) 18:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Is 'missile vehicle' really a thing? Is it a recognisable term in ready and common use, or accepted by specialist experts as an appropriate collective term? Is it 'real' enough to justify an article?