Talk:Mission San Francisco Solano

Sem-Yeto

"Chief Sem-Yeto of the Suisunes tribe was baptized at the Mission and given the Christian name of Francisco Solano shortly after its founding." I took the above sentence from the article because he was also baptized as a child at Mission Dolores, according to other reliable peoples? ==

This discussion has been moved to Talk:Spanish missions in California. Mdhennessey (talk) 06:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

i love san fransisco solano so much —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.249.61.78 (talk) 23:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC) ×

MyMission.Org?

The http://www.mymission.org web site no longer seems to be working for me? Anybody else? W Nowicki (talk) 02:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Correct title

Shouldn't this article be titled Mission San Francisco Solano, without the "de"? It's named for a man named Francisco Solano, not Francisco de Solano. Maybe the confusion comes from the fact that sometimes it's referred to as Mission San Francisco Solano de Sonoma, after the town in which it's located.

I'm aware this could set up a disambiguation problem, and am open to suggestions.Huntington (talk) 18:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

reatarad takl

bgsbdy rsfr hea hafdm zghbdm had kahd sshr —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.168.156.232 (talk) 00:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

ugh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:648:8000:556D:7C3B:B632:F128:6778 (talk) 02:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

waesrdtedkojgyftdrsedfxghjkliojuyituyrdtcfgbmnjkihdtcgvbnmjkhgyfjnkl;oi9uyghjklop0ftop0iuftftyhl;,kjhcvxzhjkhgfjkfgdhjklghkfg uighjuybghjkhgvhioughcvbghjfhffciuocvxghjklbnvjkl;kmnbkl;jbnv nkl;jbnvc bnjklhgcvbkl;kjhgfvghjkhgvcbhjkhbnvchjiojklbnv njkl;opkjbnvjopjklbnvjkop;ojklbmnjklop[okl;mnb,kl;opkbmnlo;pkjmnbmkl;pkmnbjkljbnvjkl;jhbnvhjklo;jkbmnjklo;kmnb niopbmnjklo;pkjmnjklo;jbnjklo;kjbmnjklbmnlop;jkbnvhjkkhlp;ojklo;bmnjklo;jkmnbjkn

POTATO101 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:4101:AA40:490A:76A3:745B:E71E (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Is San Francisco Solano really part of the California mission .chain?

San Francisco Solano served mostly as a chapel for the solders posted around the north bay area. Each of the original missions were intended to be a days land journey from each other. However a traveler had to use a boat or ship to travel from south of the bay to the chapel. It was not on El Camino Real. It was built some time after the 'original' missions. Ralph-interdata (talk) 14:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC) Ralph-Interdata

Requested move 25 October 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Simplexity22 (talk) 16:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

---

Mission San Francisco Solano (California) → Mission San Francisco Solano – no disambig needed in title, this is a famed landmark that is fully in existence and the other article with the title is an obscure site and a stub article. The destination already redirects to the current title, which was created only to disambig from Mission San Francisco Solano (Mexico), an obscure archaeological site. The Californian mission is clearly the more known, as a prominent historical (and now tourist) landmark. A disambig line would still stay on the Californian article to direct to the archaelogical stub. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 00:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC) Cristiano Tomás (talk) 00:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 03:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

• Support. As of now, all that we would be doing by moving Mission San Francisco Solano (California) to Mission San Francisco Solano is resolving unnecessary disambiguation. And despite the low combined traffic on both pages, the article on the San Francisco one tends to get relatively more views.[1] Zzyzx11 (talk) 01:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
• Support per nom. YttriumShrew (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Edit Request - Add to history

• Please add the following text in the Reconstruction, memorial and hospital section before the setence that begins with: "In 1903, the two remaining mission buildings were purchased..."

• • In 1903, the Sonoma Valley Woman's Club raised $184 (equivalent to $6,240 in 2023) to help preserve the Sonoma Mission as a city landmark. In 1910, Club members got a lease on the property and raised $800 (equivalent to $26,160 in 2023) for repairs. They were assisted by the Native Sons of the Golden West of Sonoma. In 1911, club members petitioned the State Legislature, resulting in a appropriation of $5,000 (equivalent to $163,500 in 2023) to restore the Mission.

Greg Henderson (talk) 16:02, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Done Cristiano Tomás (talk) 18:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

References