Talk:Mobile operating system

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 94.177.32.157 in topic Worldwide smartphone sales (thousands of units)

Firefox OS

edit

There is some repetitive material pertaining to Firefox OS that should be condensed. Some of this material is listed under Current OS's despite having been discontinued.

Nemoanon (talk) 03:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merged section header to get started in that direction. - phi (talk) 09:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


future?

edit

I can't understand what happened to this edit. Did text get lost by mistake? thanks, - phi (talk) 13:07, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

UBports

edit

there are no mentions to UBports yet - it’s based on Ubuntu Touch — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:ECAB:9E01:94C0:27BA:4F4E:5D04 (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't Replicant be listed?

edit

It's actually based on LineageOS. From their own site: "Replicant uses LineageOS's source code as a base. It is rebranded to provide the Replicant look and feel (wallpapers, logos) and parts of the code are reworked to remove anti-features that can spy on the user. Most importantly, Replicant does not include any of LineageOS's proprietary components (programs, libraries, firmwares) and instead provides free software replacements for some of these. The rest of the system is also adapted so that the free software replacements can run correctly." [1] Etrapani (talk) 17:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Replicant". Replicant.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mobile operating system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

By Q1 2018, over 383 million smartphones were sold with 86.2 percent running percent running iOS.[1]

edit

Is that correct? That seems backwards and the source that it is linking to is invalid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.231.170.7 (talk) 20:53, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Timeline not “better as prose”

edit

The section Timeline was tagged on 2020-04-13 at 05:11:10‎ by @RJFJR: with a box saying it may read better as prose. I think that would only make it worse. There is indeed a lot of information there, but the list format at least makes it easier to pick out information by month and year. If one wished to make it easier to pick out developments by other criteria, a sortable table would be better. The example at MOS:PROSE shows how a list of skyscrapers may be improved by adding other information in prose format. In this section, however, there is little information beyond dates (months), phone brands, OSes, companies and features, and that is probably just as well: otherwise there would be even more to wade through to find what one wants to know. PJTraill (talk) 23:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Done. I agree with your reasoning so I have removed this template. Anton.bersh (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Split info about Android "skins" or "launchers" into a separate article

edit

The majority of content by prose length in this article is just a listing of Android "skins" or "launchers" shipped by default by some phone manufacturers. These are not actually operating systems, they are just glorified wallpapers. Users can easily install custom launchers from app stores, so it makes no sense to list all launchers in this article. Also, the article is over 150K long, well above recommended 100K article size recommended by Wikipedia:Article size. Anton.bersh (talk) 07:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:51, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Microsoft Launcher??

edit

Micorsoft Launcher is a launcher and not an operating system?? ZalnaRs (talk) 11:53, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Table unintentionally continued to bottom of page is poorly formatted

edit

The table that lists Finnish Lakes as name of operating systems. 103.94.135.14 (talk) 07:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Worldwide smartphone sales (thousands of units)

edit

The table called "Worldwide smartphone sales (thousands of units)" is obviously there only to advertise BharOS. They didn't even bother matching the fake BharOS numbers with the years in which this "operating system" actually existed on this planet. Shouldn't this joke of a table be removed? 94.177.32.157 (talk) 14:24, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply