Talk:Mother Right and the WUO
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Comments on Article Tags
editWhile it is true that the article would benefit from supporting evidence from more than one source, I wish to attest to the status of the article's subject as noteworthy. The exchanges between Alpert and Weatherwomen represent a significant debate, and so I believe the article should be permitted to develop its statement in that regard. Historytrain (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
An Introduction
editThe way that this article starts feels like it's not the begining but rather the middle and the begining has been lost. If the article could have a better introduction of "Mother Right" it would help the reader understand what is going on. An example could be to explain what the Mother right was before throwing names out. I hope this helps, over all, i htink that your artical is well written. (Wbleyla (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2010 (UTC))
Feels like a term paper
editThis article contains good information about the topic, but reads more like a term paper than an encyclopedia article. Also I believe some biographical information on Jane would help with understanding who she was and why she was so interested in WUO. --2010outdoorgal (talk) 04:01, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Jane Alpert
editI agree with a previous post that perhaps more information on Jane Albert would help add content to this page. I think it is an informative page, but needs a little more depth. LCB84 (talk) 16:33, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Note that the name is Jane Alpert, and she has a separate wiki entry which the author of this article has hyperlinked. To repeat info found on Alpert's article would not only be redundant but most likely would be erased by bots, as well. (Sherlockhemlock (talk) 19:01, 1 June 2010 (UTC))