Talk:Mohamed Tahar

(Redirected from Talk:Muhammaed Yasir Ahmed Taher)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


move?

edit

I suggest to move the article to Muhammaed Yasir Ahmed Taher following the New York Times and other secondary sources: [1], [2], [3], [4]... IQinn (talk) 00:00, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

moved. IQinn (talk) 01:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

explanation

edit

Initially I reverted this edit as the first screenful contained an annoying error. The guy is dead. The template {{birth year and age}} will only give an accurate age for him for the year of his death. If not corrected, without any obvious sign it was incorrect, for every year after his death it would grow more and more inaccurate.

But as I did a diff, to doublecheck my corrections, I saw dozens of unnecessary edits to the article's metadata.

There is a pinciple in engineering, usually phrased as "if it is not broke, don't fix it."

A lot of those unnecessary edits were to the article's citations -- which already worked perfectly. The best rule for {{cite}} templates? Edit them as little as necessary, because unnecessary edits erode the utility of the history mechanism. In particular, don't add or remove line endings. When I edit another person's {{cite}}, and it is in the all fields on one line, which I personally hate, I leave them all on one line. And I feel entitled to expect the same restraint from other contributors.

Originally all the article's citations had the names with the surname last. When I start an article I always place the surname last because I think the use of surname first is only useful on paper documents. On an online encyclopedia it is better for readers who want to check for a particular surname to use the browser's search function. The contributor who made the edit I reverted put all author surnames in surname first format. That is a lapse from the advice of wikidocuments. Worse, the authors whose names were wikilinked? They removed those wikilinks. Carol Rosenberg's name, in particular, should retain her wikilink, because her coverage of Guantanamo is so important for the overall story. How are readers going to use the "what links here" feature to see which Guantanamo articles referenced her work if someone goes around removing these important links?

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 05:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Geo Swan: My mistake with the age. "if it is not broke, don't fix it." – It was (and is again) broken and needs fixing. You reintroduced blatant errors (visible on the page in red text) in the references. Also, |author= should never hold the name of more than one author. |authorn= are meant for organizational authors and |lastn=/|firstn= for individuals. As far as links go, linking Carol Rosenberg is overlinking since Rosenberg is already inked in the article, and IIRC, the others were red links. Using WLH is not an accurate way to track citations to an author's work. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Mohamed Tahar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply