Talk:Museum of Socialist Art
(Redirected from Talk:Museum of Socialist Art, Sofia)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Nvvchar in topic GA Review
Museum of Socialist Art has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 7, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Museum of Socialist Art appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 April 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Museum of Socialist Art, Sofia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Will review this soon. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- General
- Are there really no more sources for this article? It may be called "not notable" then.
- Yes, I found four book refrences which In have added with some text
- Lead and infobox
- Name the language in the infobox
- Linked to Bulgarian language
- I think the two paras can be merged.
- Merged.
- Description
- What is "easel"?
- It is easel painting. Now linked
The prose is fine, and those are my comments for an article as short as this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 16:05, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sainsf I will address the above issues shortly. But what is the minimum number of references required for a GA?Nvvchar. 07:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sainsf With four book refrences and some additional text, it should be OK. Please see. Will be glad to address any other issues. Thanks.Nvvchar. 08:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Seems fine now. This should make a GA. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, Sainsf.Nvvchar. 00:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)