Talk:Record sales
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Record sales article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 23 June 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Music recording sales → Record sales – It seems that "Record sales" is a more widely used term. A result on Google Search displays 2,490,000 entries for "Record sales" and only 16,600 entries for "Music recording sales", with the latter result more referring to Certification than the "Sales" itself. The new title will be also inline with Record shop, Record collecting, Record chart, Record label, and Record producer. Bluesatellite (talk) 03:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. TheSandDoctor Talk 16:50, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- "Record sales" could potentially exclude digital sales, no? — AjaxSmack 21:00, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- @AjaxSmack: This is what I found about "digital record sales" [1][2][3][4]. Rihanna would not have sold 230 million "records" if it was not for digital downloads. Bluesatellite (talk) 23:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. — AjaxSmack 23:25, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- @AjaxSmack: This is what I found about "digital record sales" [1][2][3][4]. Rihanna would not have sold 230 million "records" if it was not for digital downloads. Bluesatellite (talk) 23:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nom; WP:CONSISTENCY with other articles is a dealbreaker for me, and I don't think that a confusion with "excellent sales" is likely. No such user (talk) 11:11, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Still the common name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Chart needed
editI think we should add a chart for sales per year by format, for example, like the one at https://www.visualcapitalist.com/music-industry-sales/ https://www.whathifi.com/news/vinyl-record-sales-drop-in-2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.71.17.254 (talk) 11:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)