Talk:My Life (Mosley autobiography)

Untitled

Has anyone read this? I'm curious as to how this man retrospectively views his own life in light of his blackened name. --Randall00 ^Talk 22:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

• Hey, you can read Oswald Mosley's book online here: http://www.globusz.com/ebooks/Mosley/ Bronks 22:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

What an arrogant man. 'My Life'. How boring. 199.111.191.58 (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Given the polarizing nature of Mosley's post-parliament political career, the article should give us some idea of the book's content and not just go on about how well it sold, how it was promoted, and how well-written its blurbs claim it to be. Is it a mea culpa, and apologia, an act of defiance...what? (The above link to the online version of the book is no longer active, by the way.) TheScotch (talk) 09:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

I’ve had a shot at this today, though it’s hard to avoid POV altogether. There are no cites, but the following section ‘Reception’ may be taken as the equivalent. Valetude (talk) 21:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mosleys.life.jpg

Image:Mosleys.life.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Kind of bogus

The plaudits from the wife's book are kind of a test case of distortion, in that (like those one-adjective lines used on movie posters) they omit the rest of the review, which could be simply offering an iota of praise among a cartload of opprobrium. Recommend deletion. Theonemacduff (talk) 15:37, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

I agree, this article is a joke. Thatsmeme (talk)16:38, 26 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.146.101.7 (talk)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on My Life (Oswald Mosley autobiography). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070904215623/http://www.oswaldmosley.com/downloads/My%20Life.lit to http://oswaldmosley.com/downloads/My%20Life.lit
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061202043437/http://www.oswaldmosley.com/downloads/My%20Life.pdf to http://oswaldmosley.com/downloads/My%20Life.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Seriously Needs Editing

This article has been flagged a few times since 2006 but it doesn't look like anything has been done about it. Half the assertions are without citation or from massively biased sources. The entire article needs revision or deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.72.200 (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Deleted claims attributed to Diana Oswald's book

The only reference in this article points to his wife's own autobiography. The citations are all suspicious, to say the least. They give no page numbers, the book is not widely available (not at McGill University libraries for example) and does not exist in digital format. There is good reason to believe that they are misleading at best. For example, it attribute a positive reception to Malcolm Muggeridge, claiming: "The only living Englishman who could perfectly well have been either Conservative or Labour prime minister," maintained Malcolm Muggeridge. If he said this, cite him directly, not Mosley's wife. If we are to cite Mosley's wife to represent Muggeridge's exact words, at least give a page number. As far as I can tell, Muggeridge did not hold Mosley in any kind of high esteem, as indicated by this article in the New Statesman. [1] Dussault (talk) 04:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

I add that the unreferenced description of the book also strike me as spurious. For example, it claims "Mosley naturally provokes some of the ‘what if?’ theories of history, such as the prospect of Prime Minister Mosley working with the pro-Mussolini King Edward VIII." I found the digital version of the book and none of pages that mention Edward refer to Mussolini. Dussault (talk) 04:23, 23 March 2020 (UTC)