Talk:Hybrid beasts in folklore

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Orcahasenteredthechat. Peer reviewers: Eternalsabre, Renee. Beaumont.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Iris Paige. Peer reviewers: Overbrewed.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

"Were" means "Man"

Most vampires in fiction are "Werevampires" (linguistic issues aside). Bunnicula is a rare exception.

merging content from Half-creatures?

Editors here may be interested in this ongoing discussion. --B. Wolterding (talk) 21:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Motif rather than motive

In para 6 and 7, does the author mean "motif" rather than "motive"? Motif is a recurring salient thematic element in a work of art, which is what is being described. Virgil H. Soule (talk) 13:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Not Substantiated in Linked Article

Under the Egyptian category, it mentions a "cobra-headed Amunet," but when you go to the article about her, there's no mention of a snake head of any sort, and the picture of a depiction of her appears to show a human head. The only snake-like thing in the entire article is what appears to be a cobra in one of the example hieroglyphs.

I don't know if this is a false claim, a poorly summarized one, or an accurate one whose subject is somehow completely omitted in the subject article.

Thanks! 68.65.37.10 (talk) 17:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 2 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. This discussion attracted little attention and less agreement, and the relist doesn't seem to have helped. Consequently, a consensus has not emerged for or against any action. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

---

Hybrid beasts in folklore → Mythological hybrid – No justification for change in scope, or precedent for using the term "beasts". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – robertsky (talk) 12:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 14:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

• Comment - folklore, mythology, legend, fairy tale. We can turn ourselves in knots trying to pick one over the other. Though it would seem from reading the article, that Folklore is the over-arching genre here. Whatever is done here, should also be done to: List of hybrid creatures in folklore. And with that in mind, regardless of anything else, we should use creatures, and not beasts. - jc37 02:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Mythology has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 14:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.