Talk:NATO Integrated Air Defense System

Cold War Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

NATO (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles

Move?

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Shouldn't this article be named NATO Integrated Air Defense System? NATO? / JTragardh (talk) 19:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Spelling of defence/defense

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article implies that the spelling of defence varied between the international and the US versions. Is this actually the case?Royalcourtier (talk) 06:26, 25 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes it is, NATO uses 'defence' while the US uses 'defense'.

Add topic