Talk:Namsan
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Can someone clarify "early times", please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpbarrass (talk • contribs)
- Please take a look at the reference I've added. --Sjhan81 04:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Namsan (Seoul). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613142445/http://www.bunkyo.ac.jp/faculty/lib/slib/kiyo/Int/it1901/it190110.pdf to http://www.bunkyo.ac.jp/faculty/lib/slib/kiyo/Int/it1901/it190110.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Namsan
editQuestion
editHi @Dantus21, I'm rewriting MOS:KO and realizing I don't understand what the instructions for disambiguating mountains are. Could you explain what the rationale was for the move from Namsan (Seoul) -> Namsan Mountain? Was it WP:COMMONNAME or was it for disambiguation per the MOS? seefooddiet (talk) 04:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Seefooddiet
- Thanks for bringing this up; it was on my mind for a while. I’m gonna be honest in that my move wasn’t the best planned out. I initially wanted to move this page for the sake of making "Namsan" redirect here without needing to make a RM or RMT, as the Seoul mountain imo is definitely the primary topic (I can send pageview stats if you want). However, since I couldn’t move it to "Namsan" alone, I moved it to "Namsan Mountain" as it seemed relatively in use despite being tautological, and at the least "Namsan" could redirect there. Looking back I should’ve just done an RM or RMT to move to "Namsan", and if you want to do either of those (RMT would admittedly take less time if accepted) I’d strongly encourage you to do so.
- Good luck with the MOS rewrite, Dantus21 (talk) 05:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ah that makes sense. I may do a RMT in near future. Thanks for the reply! seefooddiet (talk) 05:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. I went ahead and did an RMT as the name is bugging me too much lol. Fingers crossed on it going well 🤞. Speaking of which, what was the provision you had planned for disambiguating mountains? I might throw in my two cents if I could Dantus21 (talk) 05:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- You could make a new post on the talk page here.
- To help you decide whether you want to make a talk post, will share my current thought. Thinking about recommending Wikipedia:WikiProject Mountains#Naming conventions. Category:Mountains of South Korea currently some of the mountains match this standard, like Maehwasan (Gangwon) and the unfortunately lengthy Maebongsan (Wonju and Yeongwol), but some don't, like Obongsan (Haman/Jinju). I suspect the slash is unencyclopedic; maybe should be "and". seefooddiet (talk) 06:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- You probably saw the ping already but just in case not I made a post there Dantus21 (talk) 07:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. I went ahead and did an RMT as the name is bugging me too much lol. Fingers crossed on it going well 🤞. Speaking of which, what was the provision you had planned for disambiguating mountains? I might throw in my two cents if I could Dantus21 (talk) 05:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ah that makes sense. I may do a RMT in near future. Thanks for the reply! seefooddiet (talk) 05:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)