Talk:Naskapi

Copyright infringement

This article is a verbatim copy of this page. Since the source bears a copyright notice (“© Naskapi Nation of Kawawachikamach”), I would appreciate clarification! Thanks.

Here's our clarification:

http://www.naskapi.ca/en/common/web_site_policy.htm

Information on this site has been posted with the intent that it be readily available for personal and public non-commercial use and may be reproduced, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from the Band Office. We ask only that:

1. Users exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; 2. Band Office of the Naskapi Nation of Kawawachikamach be identified as the source department; and, 3. The reproduction is not represented as an official version of the materials reproduced, nor as having been made, in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Band Office of the Naskapi Nation of Kawawachikamach. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjancewicz (talk • contribs) 20:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Information was clearly lifted from the above website, and this kind of non-commercial license doesn't work for wikipedia. Content removed. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 21:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you clarify "doesn't work?" This content was written by the band for use on websites such as this, not the other way around. Benjancewicz (talk —Preceding undated comment was added at 02:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naskapi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100113141211/http://www.naskapi.ca/en/default.htm to http://www.naskapi.ca/en/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Neutrality

The history section while very interesting is more suited to an personal essay, opinion piece, or perspective article. It is also not written in an encyclopedic tone. The information about planning of the housing development for Naskapi and Montagnais, the dynamic between the community and the Norther Affairs office, and it's impact, along with the contextualization and explanation as to its importance and meaning is very interesting but 1. is not verified or sourced 2. Makes assumptions 3. Is written in a casual tone. While there are legitimate questions about history, oral tradition, how that is framed and verified when it comes to topics concerning indigenous history (as well as very small, isolated settlements), I have seen this sort of out-of-character, non-encyclopedic style and approach in many English wikipedia articles on indigenous topics. A better balance needs to be found and contributors and editors who are not used to writing neutrally and in an encyclopedic style should be better informed, supported, and their work corrected as needed. Abdulrahimb (talk) 02:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Any problems with removing this unsourced claim

It is spoken by all of them and written by many. English is their second language 199.119.233.164 (talk) 13:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)