Talk:Nathan F. Twining

(Redirected from Talk:Nathan Farragut Twining)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by American99robin in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Bio information from Air University Bio this is a US Air Force web site, and I believe this makes it PD. Rogerd 21:10, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nathan Farragut Twining. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:36, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the Wikipedia article on USAF General Nathan Farragut Twining: Throughout this article are numerous errors in English grammar, usage, and syntax. The errors indicate that the primary author is not likely to be a native speaker of English. This can raise questions in the minds of some readers as to why someone with unknown experience of American military history has chosen this topic. I would encourage the Wikipedia staff to review this article and bring its grammar, usage, and syntax into conformity with good English, so that future readers will be more likely than is now the case to accept its contents as dependable.
E. R. Hatcher, MD, PhD American99robin (talk) 01:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply