Wikipedia

Talk:National Defence Radio Establishment

(Redirected from Talk:National Defence Radio Establishment (Sweden))
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

S1

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The link to the S1 unit says it's been disbanded since 2006. Is something wrong? --AW (talk) 17:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Which link are you talking about? 81.225.216.21 (talk) 14:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
The user was commenting on something long since removed. See Old revision of National Defence Radio Establishment (Sweden) / Gavleson (talk) 02:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge into National Defence Radio Establishment (Sweden)

I propose FRA law be merged into National Defence Radio Establishment (Sweden). I've recently made an extensive rewrite of the page on FRA law, and I think a merger of that page into this one makes a lot of sense. The reasons are:

  • duplication of content
  • significant overlap (which cannot be avoided)
  • context reasons

The main reason: This page doesn't have a section about the oversight of the FRA, which kind of important. It's mentioned, but not in detail, and simply moving that information from the page on the FRA law to this page would result in significant loss of context on FRA law.

This page is not that big to begin with, and if I remove the duplication of content, it shouldn't become that much larger after a merger. You can compare this page in size and content with other pages on signals intelligence agencies: NSA and GCHQ. If you have an opinion, please post it here. Gavleson (talk) 17:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Some clarification: Obviously, I feel the section "Scope, limits and provisions" is equally important as the one titled "Oversight". Renamed "Legal framework" it very much belongs on this page, IMO. That wouldn't leave much on FRA law... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavleson (talk • contribs) 17:49, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Since there have been no objections, I'm proceeding with the merger as per WP:MERGEPROP for the above stated reasons, and for the fact that "FRA law" is a somewhat crude translation and not an established phrase in English. Discussion closed.Gavleson (talk) 03:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Computer no longer on Top 500? See my edits on the page

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Note nr. 5 in [1]

If you click on "Government Agency" [2] it seems to prove by point (better link to add in article? Or in addition?).

Clicking on the computer [3] you see these numbers: 13,728 102.8 146.4

However the other link [4] regarding it falling down the list, before I updated the the article, gives different number: 17,280 97.5 156.2

It would appear it is a different computer because it "is", that is it seems to be an upgraded one. May this have happened again (second link here, seems to disagree). [While the core number (and peak) is higher as expected, rmax is not. Should that also be higher? Was it miscalculated the first time?] comp.arch (talk) 15:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I'm actually unsure about this. My theory was they had upgraded it, because I couldn't find the "old" supercomputer on the list. Anyway, the Swedish Wikipedia article still has it listed 126 in 2011 using this source, but there has to be a more recent update... Appreciate the help on this. Gavleson (talk) 15:28, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on National Defence Radio Establishment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:National_Defence_Radio_Establishment&oldid=1209322394"