This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
None of these title words are consistently capitalized when this phrase is used in sources, though Parliament comes closer than the others; so I moved it accordingly. The article already had member of parliament lowercase in places, so it's not obvious what's the best way to get consistent. Dicklyon (talk) 01:28, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago15 comments9 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus seems to be that the base title should be retargeted or converted to a disambiguation page. No prejudice against speedy renomination if there's a desire to discuss other changes to the title (e.g. the suggestions by BarrelProof and the 64 IP). (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don't understand this proposal. There are several countries that have national list members of parliament. Why would we want to remove the disambiguation? Number5711:02, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
That section does not include the national list members added due to levelling of results in countries like New Zealand, Germany, etc. But I'd think it to be that single best destination, as of now, unless a new list article is created. —CX Zoom[he/him](let's talk • {C•X})16:25, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.