Talk:NAVTEX

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Navtex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070416124622/http://www.hnms.gr/hnms/english/navigation/navigation_html to http://www.hnms.gr/hnms/english/navigation/navigation_html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Should be NAVTEX

I don't care enough about it to do all the necessary editing, but the British Admiralty and the US National Weather Service refer to it as NAVTEX, not Navtex or navtex.

--plaws (talk) 15:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 31 July 2019 (outcome: moved)

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

---

Navtex → NAVTEX – The WP:COMMONNAME is NAVTEX with all caps. Glrx (talk) 01:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC) Glrx (talk) 01:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)--Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 08:31, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

• Support Both forms are in common use, so we should keep the Navtex redirect. But NAVTEX is the official name for it. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 02:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
• What about WP:TITLETM / WP:ALLCAPS / MOS:TM? I notice that just a few days ago, there was a major uppercasing edit of the article. The "official" formatting doesn't really matter so much. It seems clear that this is pronounced as a word, not spelled out letter-by-letter. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

  I see those links as permitting and even preferring NAVTEX. "On Wikipedia, most acronyms are written in all capital letters (such as NATO, BBC, and JPEG)." Online dictionaries do not have the term (it is not like scuba), but online acronym finders use the uppercase version. I do not see NAVTEX being the same ilk as scuba; a huge portion of the population knows about scuba diving, and many people spend vacations doing it; those who do it write "scuba" rather than "SCUBA"; writing "SCUBA diving" today just seems wrong. Those who do NAVTEX use "NAVTEX" mostly, but you will see "Navtex" and even the rare "navtex". Furthermore, NAVTEX is used for broadcasts in the related NAVAREAs and METAREAs, both of which are capitalized Wikipedia titles. It seems inconsistent to talk about Navtex broadcasts in a NAVAREA; more sensible is NAVTEX in a NAVAREA. Glrx (talk) 15:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

• NAVAREA and METAREA have rather unusually formatted names for Wikipedia. For example, it appears that "area" is a word, not an initialism. Those articles also don't cite many sources, and some of them are dead links. In fact, all of the citations in the NAVAREA article are dead links. —BarrelProof (talk) 05:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

• NAVTEX is the common usage IRL so it should be the usage here. These semantic (and notability!) discussions drive me bananas! It's quite simple: It's NAVTEX, not navtex. No matter how hard you may wish it wasn't so. And yes, of course there should be redirects from other capitalizations. --plaws (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose not an acronym In ictu oculi (talk) 20:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
• Support WP:TITLETM says follow standard English text formatting in the case of trademarks, unless the trademarked spelling is demonstrably the most common usage in sources independent of the owner of the trademark. Based on some searches of the web and Google Books I think "NAVTEX" is demonstrably the most common usage, though "Navtex" is not uncommon (I'd say it's roughly a 70:30 split). Interestingly, MOS:TM says editors should examine styles already in use by independent reliable sources. From among those, choose the style that most closely resembles standard English. So my reading of policy says "NAVTEX" should be the title, but we should use "Navtex" in running text. Which is a little weird, but whatever. Colin M (talk) 21:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.