Talk:Neither Here nor There (Fringe)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Neither Here Nor There (Fringe)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 04:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ruby, I'd be glad to take this one. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-5 days. Thanks as always for your work on these! -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Initial comments

This is quite strong and clearly ripe for promotion--thanks for your work on it! I've noted two small suggestions about the prose below.

• "They are then informed of the suspect's location" -- who is "they" here?
• "COTW-er, complete with Freak-Meet" -- this gets a bit jargony for the casual reader. I'm not sure if the best solution here is to overwrite part of the quotation with bracketed text, add parenthetical text, add an explanatory footnote maybe? -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

• Both comments addressed. Let me know if there's anything else! Ruby 2010/2013 02:05, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Very small clarity issues noted above. Spotchecks show no copyright issues.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass

Requested move 23 September 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed for over a week. Jenks24 (talk) 07:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

---

Neither Here Nor There (Fringe) → Neither Here nor There (Fringe) – Although "Nor" is used as part of a person's or thing's name in transliterated foreign language, this isn't the case. "nor" is a coordinating conjunction for the title. Per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CT, it should be lowercased. George Ho (talk) 06:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Neither Here nor There (Fringe). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130210070723/http://www.fox.com/fringe/recaps/season-4/episode-1/ to http://www.fox.com/fringe/recaps/season-4/episode-1/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130210070723/http://www.fox.com/fringe/recaps/season-4/episode-1/ to http://www.fox.com/fringe/recaps/season-4/episode-1/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)