Talk:Neither one nor many
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
editB9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 14:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Dharmatā
Lalitavistara (xiii.102, p 176)
bījasya sato yantāṅkuro na ca yo bīja sa cāiva aṅuro/
na ca tato na cāiva tat evamanuccheda aśāśvata dharmatā/
"In the same way as when a sprout [is produced] from an existent seed the seed is not the sprout - neither [is it simply different] from it nor [is it simply identical] with it-, just so, [the seed being] neither destroyed [i.e. completely different form its sprout] nor eternal [i.e. completely identical with its sprout], [that is] the [real] nature of things (dharmatā)."
Chandrakirtī comments:
pratītya yad yad bhavati na hi tāvat tad eva tat/
na cānyad api tat tasmān nōchinaṃ nāpiśāśvatam/
"That which comes into existence in dependence is, then, not that, nor is it other, either. Thus, it is neither destroyed nor eternal." [1]
Blessed Catuskoti
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 11:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Requested move 4 November 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 01:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Neither one nor many (gcig du 'bral ba'i gtan tshigs) → Neither one nor many – Unnecessary parenthetical phrase. Shall I explain more? George Ho (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support. No need to say more. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 14:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.