Talk:Isalo serotine/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Nice article! Not much we need to fiddle with:

Thanks for the review. Ucucha 06:44, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

• Mention common names in the lead.
  • In this case, I'd prefer not, since both are exceedingly obscure, as they have been mentioned only once in the literature. Garbutt (2007), for example, doesn't give a common name for this species, though he does for others.
    • Okay! My bad, actually, for not noticing that :)

• Can Eptesicus malagasyensis be considered a synonym, or is that only the IUCN Red lists classification?
  • It's only the Red List (based on the upcoming Mammals of Africa volume, apparently), but nevertheless a synonym. Added.
    • Check.

• I'll assume you'll add an image whenever possible :) Non-issue there. Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes, none available unfortunately. Ucucha 06:44, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Very good :) We pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article Neoromicia malagasyensis passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass