Wikipedia

Talk:Nevada Test and Training Range

(Redirected from Talk:Nevada Test and Training Range (Geographic area))
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)
Learn more about this page

Merger

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago9 comments4 people in discussion

The 98th Range Wing was redesignated Nevada Test and Training Range in 2011. If there is no consensus on merging the articles, the two articles need to be disambiguated. Lineagegeek (talk) 00:55, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Agree Bwmoll3 (talk) 01:20, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Merge it, Lineagegeek. Buckshot06 (talk) 04:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
OK. Now that I have edited the 98th Range Wing to something like a C Class article -- I still need to show the replacement of subordinate units by directorates in 2011 and add cites to remove the tag for lack of citations in the section and have looked at this page more closely and perhaps add images, I believe separate articles and disambiguation is the way to go.
This page needs expansion to include earlier names, management by the 554th Operations Support Wing, 99th Range Group, other elements of the 99th Air Base Wing, earlier names (Continental (something) Range comes to mind, but I'm not a USAF installations maven), unclassified references to classified projects carried on in the range, etc. Once that expansion is done I don't think the articles would be compatible.
So, while I think that the wing article is primary based on notability, I think most people looking at an encyclopedia would be looking for the installation, not the unit. I'll do the moves and hatnotes if needed, but I'd like some input on possible names. I tend to prefer a hatnote to a separate disambiguation page, but I'm looking for suggestions on the most excellent names. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
I'll give it a week, but right now my inclination is to move this article to Nevada Test and Training Range (geographic area) and move the 98th Range Wing article here once the space is free, with hatnotes on each. --Lineagegeek (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. While the unit has been redesignated, the range itself is clearly the primary topic. Article disambiguation is needed only when there is no primary topic. So since the range is the primary topic, it should remain at the primary name space. The unit can be disambiguated and navigation can be address through hat notes. This is going to need a full WP:RM discussion.Vegaswikian (talk) 20:45, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
A belated welcome to the discussion VW. I think the last week's discussion indicates that the clarity concerning which is primary is not so clear. The discussion you requested was already opened, so join on in. I assume you agree that merger is inappopropriate.--Lineagegeek (talk) 23:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
No, the merger is totally inappropriate! You have an article on an area of land which is notable on its own. Then you have an article about a military unit. Just because they happen to share a name at the current time, is not a reason to do a merge. Two articles are totally appropriate. Trying to add military history of a unit to a training range is simply not the best choice. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
I find it very strange that the Air Force chose to rename an organization after a piece of real estate.. but they did. I would rename the unit article Nevada Test and Training Range (Military Unit) and leave this article the way it is. Bwmoll3 (talk) 18:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Nevada Test and Training Range. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nevada Test and Training Range. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nevada Test and Training Range. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nevada_Test_and_Training_Range&oldid=1207171650"