Talk:New Denver

Ethnocentric history strikes again

Getting to be a common pattern, sadly, in BC. This article, if written, shouldn't have focussed only on the Japanese-Canadian internment, and might have made an effort to talk about the Idaho Peak galena mines and the history of the Slocan, and about other ethnicities/peoples resident in New Denver. Ethnocentric history is, to me, a genuine pain in the ass, and kind of insulting, too.Skookum1 00:38, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Cell Phones/WiFi

Can this be somehow incorporated? http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070723/wr_nm/cellphones_dc http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/dept-of-huh%3F/town-goes-cell+phone-free-then-announces-wi+fi-for-all-281361.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.30.202.15 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 23 July 2007

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. It's possible the village shouldn't be a primary topic, but with "New Denver" redirecting here, it already is. No prejudice against a move showing why that shouldn't be. --BDD (talk) 21:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

New Denver, British Columbia → New Denver – Name is unique, no secondary uses exist, target is redirect to current title. Canadian disambiguation rules per CANSTYLE say unique town/city names take no disambiguation Skookum1 (talk) 03:29, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

• Comment. There's also New Denver (album), which while is an independently produced album, may challenge the primary usage of "New Denver". The BC village only has a population of 504. Basically, we have a small village vs. a small-time album. I'm not convinced that the village deserves the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC status. —seav (talk) 00:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Further comment. The album has been tagged as having a disputed notability (since 2012). So there may be a case that the village deserves the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC status. —seav (talk) 00:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
    • Suffice to say the town is on the map....the band is not.Skookum1 (talk) 04:35, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Denver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130614000834/http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/station_metadata_e.html?StnId=1275 to http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/station_metadata_e.html?StnId=1275

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Zincton, etc.

I undid the revisions to this article that deleted "Flora and Fauna" and added a "We are a small municipality..." section. Far as I know, encyclopedias don't claim to be small municipalities, so the section was obviously inserted to promote the village. Also added the Zincton Controversy section. Blind Donkey (talk) 03:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC)