Talk:New product development

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ryzovnik in topic Issues with this page.

I cannot help feeling that this is a backward step - books by Pugh, Pahl & Beitz & Nam Suh and many others have been published that show both a long history of product design (Leonardo da Vinci iterated his ideas, I'm sure famous figures in other cultures will have done similar) and a modern, systematic approach. I particularly dislike the "Fuzzy front end" and "Fuzzy back end" - this seems to have little to do with Fuzzy Engineering, a distinct methodology, and in practice is not at all fuzzy - there can often be a distinct lack of specificity in the sales process but many industries employ Systems Engineers/Requirements Engineers/Concept Engineers who's daily lives accommodate creativity and who's outputs are anything but fuzzy. A modern gated product lifecycle methodology should start around identification of a potential market need/want and proceed right through to decommissioning/disposal/recycling.

Issues with this page.

edit

This page has many issues. Its overall content message is mostly correct, but it lacks citations, feels disorganized, and even repeats whole sentences in some places. I don't have an issue with the fuzzy front end, this proceeds product definition. It's been documented and discussed since the 1980's. See paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304698952_The_%27Fuzzy_Front_End%27_of_Innovation JayBristol (talk) 02:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

To me it seems like this page has been created mainly to get a backlink for airfocus.com Ryzovnik (talk) 12:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply