Wikipedia

Talk:Newspaper endorsements in the 2016 United States presidential election

(Redirected from Talk:Newspaper endorsements in the United States presidential election, 2016)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 1990'sguy in topic Missing refs
Learn more about this page

Daily Mirror?

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/americans-must-vote-hillary-clinton-9216821

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mirror

-- MrVenaCava (talk) 07:22, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Done but we can't use Wikipedia as a source. Used the reference from the article. Elisfkc (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Restoring unsourced material

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I removed some unsourced tables and an editor tried to restore them without sources. Per WP:V, "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material..."; sorry, but if you want to restore this content, you're going to have to provide reliable sources. Sparkie82 (t•c) 07:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

The info in those tables was not unsourced, it was a total/summary of the sourced info in the other tables. It seems to me this clearly falls under WP:CALC, and I think the tables are useful as many readers might otherwise spend their own time counting through the tables to get the totals.
Currently, the format and headings of section 1 do not match the other sections, as they have different headings and still have the summary tables. Was there a reason you didn't remove the others as well? ColinClark (talk) 20:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
The article's been messed up for over a week now, and no response. I'll put the tables back in. I hope we can discuss here before other changes are made instead of edit warring. ColinClark (talk) 20:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Removal of Level 4 Notes headers

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

When I passed this page through AWB, one of the alerts that popped up was "See also section out of place," which resulted from a Level 4 Notes header placed above the section. Usually, with the way I see Notes sections, I only use one combined Notes section as a Level 2 header below the See also section (if there is one), and any grouped notes can just stay at the very end of a Level 2 section without a Notes subsection. Hope this is understanding. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Newspaper endorsements in the United States presidential election, 2016. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Newspaper endorsements in the United States presidential election, 2016. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Page size

edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page is currently 524,149 bytes long; that's far too big. What's the best way to split it? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:32, 14 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Missing refs

edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Just as an FYI, many of the "citation needed" tags in the article exist because The Daily Caller was removed as a citation: [1] --1990'sguy (talk) 14:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Newspaper_endorsements_in_the_2016_United_States_presidential_election&oldid=1211562393"