Talk:Nissan Motors v. Nissan Computer
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Comments
editWho put all these citation needed boxes in this article but didn't bother to look them up? half of them are on the nissan cars wiki page. Lazy Willpower101 (talk) 02:03, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Requested Move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. No opposition after over two weeks. --BDD (talk) 17:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Nissan Computer → Nissan Motors v. Nissan Computer – The Nissan Computer company itself is not notable, however the case filed against them by Nissan Motors is, hence this article should be move to the aforementioned title and the focal point of article should be changed to reflect the title. In order words, this article should be deleted as it doesn't meet notability guidelines and an article on the case regarding the subject should be created if someone is willing to put in the effort. Relisted. Favonian (talk) 12:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC). YuMaNuMa Contrib 08:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
but it's named for its owner!
editThis statement
- "However, Nissan Computer was named after its owner, Uzi Nissan"
should be changed, the wording of it, the sense of it, and where it appears, it's almost a non sequitor. "Named after its owner" is not an important aspect of trademark in the United States; if your name is McDonald's, you can't just start selling burgers under your name because it's your name. A discussion of that aspect of trademarks is no doubt interesting, but there is no discussion on the page. More important in this case, is that Nissan Computers is in a different business than Nissan Motors, because that is relevant in trademark disputes. 68.175.11.48 (talk) 18:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Outcome
editSo... what was the ouctome of the case? The article doesn't actually say. Taras (talk) 05:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)