Talk:Non-Commissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-commissioned vs. Noncommissioned
editThis topic is about a specific ribbon, not a generic ribbon. It seems appropriate that since it is a US award, the US spelling of the specific ribbon is appropriate. 184.6.178.177 (talk) 01:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was: Page Moved per discussion below and this ref. Station1 (talk) 20:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Non-Commissioned Officer Development Ribbon → Non-Commissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon — Actual award title, as in lead.--75.202.128.66 (talk) 18:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
I notice the original lead matched the current article title. It would be good to have some evidence of common usage one way or another. Failing that, either title seems equally acceptable to me. Andrewa (talk) 05:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Suggested new title seems a little better. --Pmsyyz (talk) 06:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.