This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move request
editSimilar articles in the form of "Nuclear power in ..." exist for a whole host of countries and I think this should be moved without changing the content. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 00:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- What do you mean with move? Do you mean merge instead? In that case, merge from where to where? — Indon (reply) — 07:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- No, move to Nuclear power in Indonesia like the template above says. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 13:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ah I see. Support. No problem with that. — Indon (reply) — 15:51, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Great. I'll get to work making this up to speed with the templates and categories. And like I said, the content of the article is perfect, nothing needs changing there. I'll get some graphics and other stuff as well eventually, depending on how events progress. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 03:20, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ah I see. Support. No problem with that. — Indon (reply) — 15:51, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- No, move to Nuclear power in Indonesia like the template above says. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 13:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Queries for further information
editIs there so far any media coverage or speculation about when will the nuclear waste be disposed and treated? In order to consider the feasibility of the whole nuclear power plant project, one must also consider the aftermath. After all, nuclear waste, if left not properly treated will be extremely harmful towards the people. ~ Comicreader13 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Comicreader13 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Naming
editThere is a discussion which is also related to this article or category. You are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)