Talk:O-class Melbourne tram
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | On 22 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to O class Melbourne tram. The result of the discussion was no consensus, though there was a suggestion to add redirects from the unhyphenated versions, which received no objection and will be created following closure. |
Proposed merge with N-class Melbourne tram
editmany articles created for Melbourne tram by user merge them into one article India1277 (talk) 03:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Trams built for different operators in different years to different dimensions. Only thing in common is built by same manufacturer and after 6-10 years ended up in common ownership. Pv96 (talk) 04:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Removing hyphen from article name
editI am proposing to remove the hyphen from the title of this tram article, as the official nomenclature from the Department of Transport and Planning is not to have hyphens in tram class names. Examples include on their official website [1], the Melbourne Tram Plan [2] and the PTV website [3]. Other common unofficial sources like Vicsig also do not have a hyphen. I'm also proposing to change all the other Melbourne tram class article names in a similar manner, any feedback welcome! Takerlamar (talk) 00:03, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:G-class Melbourne tram which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)