Talk:OScar

(Redirected from Talk:OScar (open source car))
Latest comment: 7 years ago by 73.241.41.247 in topic Why does this even have an article?

The right link to OScar in the German entry

edit

Can someone please correct the link to OScar image in the German entry ? I have copied the link but it doesn't seems to work. I didn't find the image in commons ? I can't understand why people are breaking Wikipedia rules of putting all the images in commons so syntax access will always be uniform so won't not have to learn everytime a new syntax --Khalid hassani 13:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Picture

edit

{{Picture}}--Mac 07:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nowikied your template as the article has since gotten a picture. -- intgr 10:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I really think the picture is not very good to include in the article. No all the open vehicles explode. I really think it´s more easy a closed and propietary ICEV (Internal combustion engine vehicle) can explode than a open electric vehicle. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.87.96.65 (talk) 15:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Versatile Vehicle Architecture

edit
"A long term goal is also to introduce standardization in parts manufacturing (very much in the open source way) to use economies of scale. This is a radical change"

Is this anything like Lotus's Versatile Vehicle Architecture? Would mentioning that be relevant to this article? -- intgr 10:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Open Source Green Vehicle

edit

Why is it that OSGV redirects to OScar when they are seperate projects? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.195.8.11 (talk) 18:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Status in 2013

edit

Does anyone know what the status of this project is? The OScar website has not been updated, and no decent refs exist beyond 2007. Presumably it has died? Warren (talk) 15:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why does this even have an article?

edit

This seems to be nothing but a crappy CAD project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.241.41.247 (talk) 05:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply