Talk:Obscure (video game)
Fair use rationale for Image:Obscure cover.jpg
edit
Image:Obscure cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
#c-BetacommandBot-2007-06-06T05:01:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:Obscure_cover.jpg){kind=link}
Hm... all of my edits were reverted yet I was only fleshing out a bit more detail to the game and its story. A game like resident evil has many more articles with desciptions similar to what I put. Is there any reason? 64.230.19.246 (talk) 16:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
#c-64.230.19.246-2008-05-05T16:55:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:Obscure_cover.jpg){kind=link}
Chin up, one person who remove your edits relized he did it by mistake and un-undid your edits. I added in the other content removed by that next guy because it's true. There is a creature just like you described. Un-bias (talk) 17:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
#c-Un-bias-2008-05-05T17:21:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:Obscure_cover.jpg){kind=link}
Spoiler/Non-Spoiler
editThis article mixes information about the plot and story of the game, as well as the end, fairly freely within all the sections. Could it be edited to make a more general section without such information? For someone that is using the article to find out about the game, finding certain key plot points in the character description (such as where the character is found, or whether they survive the game), for instance, is frustrating. Lorechaser (talk) 19:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- I also feel that the article goes over much more than it should, but in particular that it reveals many of the plot elements of the second game in the article for the first game. Shouldn't those comments be kept in the second article, or, if they are needed, in the section labeled 'Obscure II'. I know that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an un-spoiler, but that's rather too much detail for this article. Mizunori (talk) 04:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Removed spoilers. 97.96.68.40 (talk) 22:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
German Soundtrack
editCan someone actually put the names of the songs into the article, rather than just 'In the German version there were many songs from Sportfreunde Stiller.' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.163.44 (talk) 17:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Requested moves
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:05, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
– Per WP:MOSTM: "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, regardless of the preference of trademark owners." I don't think CamelCase applies here since "Obscure" isn't a compound word. Mika1h (talk) 12:15, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support for the same reason that the use of InFamous as an article title was rejected.--67.68.22.129 (talk) 23:48, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.