Talk:Obshchak
(Redirected from Talk:Obtshak)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Extraordinary Writ in topic Requested move 27 December 2022
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 27 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Obtshak to Obshchak. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Untitled
editThe article should be rewritten. As the notion of common criminal fund is not Estonian specific, it is widespread on all the ex USSR territory. And the Estonian specific data would be included in the separate section if it is relevant to the topic at all.Artur Zinatullin (talk) 10:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
correction
editThe error in diff from 26 February 2017, more than 5 years.
There are no RS about nationality of Tarankov, only "родом из Могилева" (borned in Mogilev). Correct. — Yuri V. (t•c) 07:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC).
Requested move 27 December 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Obtshak → Obshchak – WP:COMMONNAME: the most common form in English-language reliable sources[1] (corresponds to romanization by the modified Library of Congress system widely used in academic and popular-academic literature). —Michael Z. 22:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- In the last 35 years, the proposed spelling has represented 70% to 100% of the top two spellings.[2] (The current spelling appears in an all-time total of about three books.) —Michael Z. 04:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. I see that you've proposed a lot of transliteration changes, maybe it makes sense to do it in a centralised place. Alaexis¿question? 09:14, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- I think the bigger picture might warrant a reevaluation of WP:RUS. But this handful of article titles each depends on the clear usage in sources of one particular name, so I don’t see the need for a combined vote. —Michael Z. 14:43, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support per well-researched nomination. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 03:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.