Talk:British Columbia Energy Regulator

Request assistance with updated court case ruling

edit

On Oct. 10, 2014, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled: "I conclude that the interpretation that successive or recurrent approvals may be granted is reasonable and, in any event, correct. The petition is dismissed." [1]

  1. ^ "Western Canada Wilderness Committee v. British Columbia (Oil and Gas Commission), 2014 BCSC 1919". Retrieved 22 January 2015.

Wrightwords (talk) 23:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Not done Not clear what it is you want doing here. Please provide in a Change X to Y format. Amortias (T)(C) 22:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Done I already inserted the Supreme Court ruling in this edit, Amortias. I also asked Wrightwords for a photo we can use for the page, but no reply...--Wuerzele (talk) 02:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply