Talk:Open Finance

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Open Finance/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Fintechfraser (talk · contribs) 23:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Phlsph7 (talk · contribs) 08:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello Fintechfraser and thanks for all your improvements to this article. However, despite the improvements, the article fails criterion 2b since there are too many unreferenced paragraphs. Examples are the paragraphs starting with "The concept of Open Finance arose", "The CDR is designed to foster competition", and "The European Union's approach to open finance is guided". According to criterion 2b, these passages require inline citations "no later than the end of the paragraph". Additionally, the article also has the maintenance template "Original research" at the top. I suggest that you add all the relevant references and address the maintenance template before a renomination.

A few other observations

• WP:EARWIG detects no copyvios
• Open Finance refers to the concept and practice expressions like "refers to" should be avoided in the first sentence, see MOS:REFERS
• In July 2022, Colombia has published Decree 1,297 remove "has"

Phlsph7 (talk) 08:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Open Finance or open finance?

Open banking article uses lower case letters (open banking, not Open Banking). Is there a reason to use upper case letters here? Blakocha (talk) 12:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)