This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dead link
edit'^ Bill Snyder (21 February 2008). "Is counting open source code contributions really useful?". InfoWorld. http://weblog.infoworld.com/tech-bottom-line/archives/2008/02/the_open_source.html. Retrieved on 2008-02-29.'
Seems to dead, redirecting to a list of his blog posts. --129.49.7.125 (talk) 17:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Fixed dead link, new one seems to be http://www.infoworld.com/t/tech-industry-analysis/counting-open-source-code-contributions-really-useful-208 --87.187.103.107 (talk) 00:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
sourceforge
editSourceForge recently caught that Ohloh was aquired.. Still exploring the site and unfamiliar with it until now so I can hardly comment.
http://www.ohloh.net/pages/157 http://www.ohloh.net/announcements/sourceforge_acquires_ohloh
and the caphta is:yardsknees —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.78.16.157 (talk) 01:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see any reason to merge the two articles more than merging Delicious into Yahoo or YouTube into Google. Moreover, the acquisition was just announced and it's way too early to understand if Ohloh will survive as a service on its own or be integrated into Sourceforge--DarTar (talk) 05:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see it as just a purchase, but, as sourceforge stated, the services WILL be merged as well, unlike what happens with the given examples. HuGo_87 (talk) 02:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- According to what I'm reading, the services will not be merged, but rather expanded to complement each other.
Note: discussion should be at Talk:SourceForge#Merge Ohloh here, not the Ohloh talk page.
--Tothwolf (talk) 02:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- According to what I'm reading, the services will not be merged, but rather expanded to complement each other.