Talk:Nationwide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nationwide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Tulsi
editBig thanks to the people who contributed to the graph near the top of the page, but don't you guys think we should include the data for Tusli? I know she scores low, but the fact that she is one of only 3 people still in the race, has to count for something, right? Nate Hooper (talk) 21:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. With only three candidates in the race, it makes sense that her polling average should be in the graph. --Comment by Selfie City (talk about my contributions) 15:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- It’s Tulsi, and not Tusli, though, by the way :) --Comment by Selfie City (talk about my contributions) 15:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done (using data from Melencron's graph up to July, and polling aggregates from then on). Others line still needs to be updated. Chessrat (talk, contributions) 14:42, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Subsamples and Favourability
editCertain polls like YouGov/Economist regularly put out questions for candidate favourability and then have democratic primary subsamples we could theoretically use. I tend to be a bit hesitant about using these in general unless there is a large subsample (say, n=1000+), respected trackers like 538 use them, or if their use is already agreed for the page in question. However, not many aggregates besides wikipedia are tracking favourability anyway, and we appear to have started using subsamples.
Is this ok? If not, I will remove the Fox News favourability rating. If nobody minds, I'll get around to adding some of these subsamples in the days to come.
—PutItOnAMap (talk) 4:01, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Archiving
editIs there a reason why only 10% of the links have Internet Archive mirrors attatched to them? I see the Archive Bot has been active here a number of times, so why don't all links have the webarchive template? Having a bunch of raw pdfs, some linked via Google Drive in here seems odd. (I assume the URLs all probably are already in the Archive, but not linked here. Would converting the raw URLs to normal references work better?) jonas (talk) 07:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)