Talk:German attack on Vimy Ridge order of battle
(Redirected from Talk:Orders of battle for the German attack on Vimy Ridge)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by AustralianRupert in topic Imported discussion
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the German attack on Vimy Ridge order of battle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Page views of this article over the last 90 days:
|
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Title
editThe operation title should be in italics but it didn't work.Keith-264 (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
New header
edit@Vami IV: Shouldn't B class be showing on the article? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 15:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- I goofed up assessing the article to B-Class standards. The only indicators of article quality that appear on the article itself are Good and Featured Articles. –Vami_IV✠ 15:30, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, I see, you've re-assessed it from B to start. Keith-264 (talk) 16:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- What's wrong with B1? Keith-264 (talk) 16:53, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Imported discussion
edit@AustralianRupert: Orders of battle for the German Attack on Vimy Ridge, 21 May 1916 B1-3 recently downgraded, justified? Keith-264 (talk) 5:45 pm, 22 March 2018, last Thursday (2 days ago) (UTC+0)
- Just a query, but shouldn't this be assessed as a list? If it is, I'd argue that it is at least CL-class, if not very close to BL. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 1:06 am, Yesterday (UTC+0)
- I don't know, it's the first one I've done from scratch, what does it need for B? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 1:04 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0)
- G'day, Keith, there are some good examples here: Category:BL-Class military history articles. Essentially, a decent lead that puts the list in context and summarises it, multiple elements that fully treat the topic, an image (or more) and citations for everything. As such, I feel it would be close to BL. Regards, AustralianRupert.
- I was thinking of something specific like the citations. Is (Data taken from Rogers The German Attack at Vimy Ridge [2010] pp. 46–47 unless indicated.) enough or should I cite each line? RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 13:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- PS I couldn't find a better diagram for the infobox but i'll have another go. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- G'day, Keith, those citations seems fine. I have seen that method used before in lists. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- PS I couldn't find a better diagram for the infobox but i'll have another go. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)