Talk:Organic Trade Association
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Tnxman307 in topic Spam Removal
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Spam Removal
editI've reverted all the way back to the last version before most of the marketing stuff was added. The article can definitely expanded, but it needs to be done so in a way that complies with WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:RS. TNXMan 15:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
The bulk of the information in the version you reverted to is both biased and inaccurate and does not reflect what OTA is or does. As such, it is important that OTA and other be permitted to make changes to the page to accurately capture OTA's mission, history, and projects.OTA (talk) 15:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but the material you added was promotional. Wikipedia articles must only contain information that is independently sourced and neutrally written. Furthermore, because you appear to have conflict of interest, you are highly discouraged from editing the article at all. TNXMan 16:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)