Talk:Ørgreen Optics
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Spelling
editThis article had been using "Orgreen" which I believe is a mis-spelling of a Danish proper noun. Ø is a distinct letter in Danish, is not "O with a diacritic" and simply substituting O is not generally acceptable. As evidence, I can point to this company's logomark and most of the sites linked to in the article.
This may be a bit controversial as this company's US partner is "Orgreen Goldsmith LLC"[1] and their North American marketing spells this with an O. However, their UK marketing retains the Danish spelling and this is an international company.
Larry (talk) 23:30, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
References
Requested move 20 November 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 18:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Orgreen Optics → Ørgreen Optics – This is a Danish proper noun, and should not be respelled. The company's logomark clearly spells this with with Ø, as do all available sources about the surname of the company's founder. One complication is the North American partner does in fact respell this with an O and uses this spelling in their marketing[1], and for this reason I have held off on making the rename myself. WP:DIVIDEDUSE Ørgreen does appear the be the predominant usage I can find, though. Larry (talk) 23:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:12, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
References