Talk:The Osborne/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 02:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Basic stuff and comments

• Infobox and lead look good. Images are also free to use.
• "Italian Renaissance style" → "Italian Renaissance-style"
  • Done.
• "contains 15 duplex level" - should this be singular or plural?
  • It should be plural. Thanks for the catch. Epicgenius (talk) 19:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
• "from east" and "from south" - shouldn't there be a "the" in between?
  • Done.
• Remove the comma after "the work of Holzer".
  • Done.
• Remove the comma after "the early 1880s".
  • Done.
• "a 11- and 15-story" → "an 11- and 15-story"
  • Done.
• WP:NYPOST - New York Post is not reliable.
  • Removed.
• Mark sources from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Done.
• Mark sources from The Real Deal with "|url-access=limited".
  • Done.

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Thanks for the review. I have addressed all of the issues above. Epicgenius (talk) 19:40, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.