This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
Since this company was founded in 2014 it is rather confusing to have a table showing "cities that have implemented its bicycle rental systems" with launch dates back to 2009.
It's also not correct to say that this company was formerly known as Bixi. We have an article on Bixi. It appears Bixi was broken up and PBSC acquired some of the assets. If this article is about the separate company, then it should be written that way. If we are treating it as the continuation of Bixi then this material should be merged into the existing article. 21:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I propose that Bixi (company) be merged into PBSC Urban Solutions. BIXI was never a company, but rather a brand created by the non-profit Public Bike System Company (or Société de Vélo en Libre-Service) which itself was formed by the City of Montréal. BIXI is/was two things - an on-the-ground bike share system installed in a few Canadian cities (e.g. BIXI Montréal) and a product once sold to various North American cities for use in their independent bike share systems (e.g. Divvy). The contents of Bixi (company) describe the early days of Public Bike System Company (and not so much the BIXI product) before it was sold and privatized as PBSC Urban Solutions, however, PBSC Urban Solutions - both in the wikipedia article and on the company's website - mark its founding as that of the Public Bike System Company and not when it was privatized some years later. As such, the information and history in the Bixi (company) article is PBSC Urban Solutions' background and history and should be merged to reflect this. --Mindfrieze (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Yes please! The current treatment of Bixi's origins is somewhat chaotic, and the Bixi (company) article is a significant part of the problem. The explanation given above by Mindfrieze corresponds to my understanding, and offers what I think is the right path towards cleaning up this topic area. – Justinbb (talk) 02:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Agree! -I had presented at the same forum with the president of PBSC back when it was still owned by the City of Montreal. BIXI was always just the brand so makes sense to merge the two to provide a more coherent history. Nubeli (talk) 17:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion
Oppose - BIXI and PBSC were once the same company before splitting. As such, they have related (but relatively static) history and development, which may be acceptable forking per WP:RELAR. Cutting the unique history of that system out of the BIXI article would be a detriment to that topic. And, since neither article is likely to have new info added to exacerbate the fork, I recommend it remain as-is. --Mindfrieze (talk) 21:29, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
_pictogram.svg){kind=small}
