Talk:Aarhus Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants
(Redirected from Talk:POP Air Pollution Protocol)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): NanCuex.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:12, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editI propose that POP Air Pollution Protocol be merged into Aarhus Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants. These two articles are about the same subject. Leyo 21:54, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, I am the creator of Aarhus Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants and I support the merger proposal. Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 23:39, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- If it is true that the titles refer to the same thing I also support. May I suggest that the title without the abbreviation persists (abbreviations in article titles should really be avoided if possible in my opinion) EvilxFish (talk) 13:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Agradman: Would you, as the creator of one of the concerned articles, be willing to do the merger? --Leyo 14:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Leyo: Sorry, I have not really edited Wikipedia in five years and it would be difficult for me to do. I just responded to this merger request because I saw the notification. I respectfully ask that someone else do the merger ... I have no particular preferences for how it's done. Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 19:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Agradman: Are you referring to technical difficulties? If so, Wikipedia:Merging#How to merge provides guidance. And even if it's technically not done perfectly, this may get fixed at a later stage. The problem I have is that I don't know much about this topic. --Leyo 23:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Leyo: No problem, I can take responsibility for this merger -- not a technical issue, it's just that I am a recovering Wikipediholic and when I had kids, I resolved that I would push as much Wikipedia editing onto others as possible :) But I can't do it immediately and I hope that's OK. Having said that, I am truly curious -- how in the hell did you locate these two articles and identify this overlap? I'm a lawyer and it took me a lot of googling and thinking to realize that these two articles are redundant. I'm honestly impressed. Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 04:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Edit: Wow, I actually did it. Please take a look and let me know if you have any feedback. Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 05:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for the merger. Too me it looks like good work. :-)
- I discovered this overlap by accident, i.e. as I was pinged through this addition that contained lots of text not belonging to the topic of the article (but to Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants). --Leyo 22:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Agradman: Are you referring to technical difficulties? If so, Wikipedia:Merging#How to merge provides guidance. And even if it's technically not done perfectly, this may get fixed at a later stage. The problem I have is that I don't know much about this topic. --Leyo 23:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Leyo: Sorry, I have not really edited Wikipedia in five years and it would be difficult for me to do. I just responded to this merger request because I saw the notification. I respectfully ask that someone else do the merger ... I have no particular preferences for how it's done. Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 19:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)