Talk:PSA XUD engine
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Title
editThe Title of this article should be changed to PSA XUD, to aid people looking for it - Anthony.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.82.58 (talk) 23:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Yes - I would agree with you too 84.9.233.170 16:33, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- at 00:40, 30 January 2006 Transnistria moved XUD to PSA XUD: "Including manufacturers name, following a suggestion and concensus with no objections" — wbm1058 (talk) 22:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Displacements
editIs there a 2.5? XUD? I was under the impression that the 2.5TD in cars like the Citroen XM was another engine. 87.81.140.191 12:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC) i was under the impression that the rover 200/400 used perkins derived diesels — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.126.141 (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The 'bubble shape' Rover 200 and 400, (later 25 and 45) had Rover L-Series engines. Early 90s R8 200/400 had the XUD 1769cc version only. 91.125.187.114 (talk) 16:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Tata Loadbeta
editDid this have an XUD engine or was it something else? It had a slightly different displacement as well.Dieselnutjob (talk) 23:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Requested move 28 March 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved. wbm1058 (talk) 21:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
PSA XUD → PSA XUD engine – The other PSA engine articles use this naming convention. Mr.choppers | ✎ 02:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.