Talk:Pakistan at the 2016 Summer Paralympics
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Courcelles in topic GA Review
Pakistan at the 2016 Summer Paralympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 17, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pakistan at the 2016 Summer Paralympics article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Pakistan at the 2016 Summer Paralympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 16:19, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- I'll do this one next. Courcelles (talk) 16:19, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Dab link in flagbearer parameter in infobox.
- Flag bearer for the closing ceremony?
- Again, am still cannot find an source that says exactly who took up this role. MWright96 (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- "at the former event" Just say 2008, both events are "former" in time, making this use a little ambiguous.
- "and earnt the" earning?
- Yep, now corrected. MWright96 (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Since you bring it up, how does his mark here compare to Beijing? Not in medal colour, but in absolute distance?
- Added this fact in a note. MWright96 (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- "In an interview The News International" In an interview with...
- Very minor niggles, good work. Courcelles (talk) 16:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Thanks again for another review. Everything that has been raised above has been addressed. MWright96 (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Good work, promoted! Courcelles (talk) 17:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Thanks again for another review. Everything that has been raised above has been addressed. MWright96 (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)