Talk:Parsurameswara Temple/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hamiltonstone (talk · contribs) 13:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Generally excellent article. It is neutral, stable, and fairly comprehensive. Images are appropriately licenced. I have copyedited it where i was clear about the intended meaning. Other points:

• At one point we have "the sanctum, called vimana," and at another "The sanctum (garbhagriha)". It can't be both - something needs fixing.

I have removed garbhagriha to make it consistent.

• "the walls are mottled by portions" - what?? Neither the use of "mottled" nor "portions" makes sense here. Can someone check this out?

rephrased

• Final section has "...prove the existence of Natyasastra tradition during the times." There need to be at least a few words explaining what this tradition is - a wikilink is not sufficient. Also specify during which times.

Good point - I had a wrong denotion here - it was Devadasi tradition, whose existence is insisted. I have rephrased the section.

I think that's it. hamiltonstone (talk) 13:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for taking up the review. Let me fix the items quoted.Ssriram mt (talk) 16:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Please let me know for further comments.Ssriram mt (talk) 17:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

I think that's it. Thank you for the prompt responses. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)