Talk:Pharmacy research

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pharmacy research article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 1 February 2013 by reviewer Ktr101 (talk · contribs).

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Advice sought on issue 'obvious'

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Editors, I would like some advice on how to improve the article Pharmacy Practice Research. The below message has been placed on the article and I don't know what it means: This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: obvious. Please help improve this article if you can. (February 2013)

Could someone explain what it means please so I can sort it out?

Cheers, Charlotte Coates(Charlottemcoates (talk) 14:52, 5 April 2013 (UTC))Reply

I have made a number of edits that hopefully resolved the more "obvious" cleanup requirements: edited the lead paragraph for brevity and neutrality, with credible references supporting the definition and the importance of this entry within Wikipedia's scope; structured the sections more similarly to follow those of other related pages (notably, health services research); added inline citations; edited the referencing format to follow Wikipedia style. There are still a couple of areas needing appropriate references (as tagged) -- hopefully someone with more in-depth knowledge of the field can add details. Guptan99 (talk) 12:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic