Talk:Piero del Pollaiuolo

Virtues

In the Uffizi in Florence in the Pollaiolo room there are 7 virtues, 6 of these virtues have been painted by Pollaiolo. Should this be mentioned or written here?? The 7th virtue is by Botticelli I just mention this 'cause they left quite an impression on me when I went to that museum last year and I have been searching the net from time to time to find them, but since I am looking at wikipedia most of the time I hadn't found them yet. I have seen that one of the virtues is on the works list: Prudence so it should be added up to 6 virtues.

The info I give now is cause I found them at the site of the Uffizi museum under room 9 I started looking there cause I know it was the room before the botticelli room. I hope you can do something with this, I just don't feel confident enough to write about them myself. Rosalind1983 12:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Piero del Pollaiolo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051230124112/http://rubens.anu.edu.au/raider4/texts/vasari/vasari.pollaiuolo.html to http://rubens.anu.edu.au/raider4/texts/vasari/vasari.pollaiuolo.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070712042040/http://www.aiwaz.net/gallery/pollaiuolo-piero-del/gc203 to http://www.aiwaz.net/gallery/pollaiuolo-piero-del/gc203

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 12 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 11:25, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

---

Piero del Pollaiolo → Piero del Pollaiuolo – The current article title is inconsistent with that for this artist's brother Antonio del Pollaiuolo, and the spelling with a "u" is the most preferred in English. See, for instance, the Benezit Dictionary of Artists, the Grove Dictionary of Art and this ngram. A complication is that the variation "Piero Pollaiuolo", without the "del", is also in use, but according to the ngram this has been less popular than the proposed version for most years since 2003. Alison Wright's The Pollaiuolo Brothers (2005), which appears to be the most recent monograph on the topic, uses the form "Piero del Pollaiuolo", as do the websites of the National Gallery and the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Ham II (talk) 10:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 01:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Visual arts has been notified of this discussion. Ham II (talk) 11:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Let's hope someone improves this stub too. Johnbod (talk) 16:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
• Favonian, closing this after less than an hour is ridiculous. It should be reopened. Johnbod (talk) 16:41, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Apollo and Daphne, now given to Piero, by the National Gallery

• ... that in recent years the 15th-century painter Piero del Pollaiuolo has been attributed with several paintings once given to his brother Antonio? Source: Complicated, as there is a before and after aspect to several. The main overall source, a book chapter, is online on academia.edu here
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/TT8

5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 16:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Piero del Pollaiuolo; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - n
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: @Johnbod: Good article. Though, the last paragraph of assigning attributions needs citing. Also, should the works section be cited? Needs QPQ. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

• Yes, thanks - give me a day or two. i'll ping you. Johnbod (talk) 02:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Ok, Onegreatjoke, done those. Johnbod (talk) 03:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Alright it's good. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)