Talk:Witold's Report

Grammar, punctuation

This article contains a non-standard (for English) apostrophe: ` instead of '. This page should be moved to "Talk:Witold's report" wanderingstan (talk) 22:57, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

I fixed a ton of grammar issues and made some minor corrections based on the Polish version of the article, which is doubtless more accurate. - Metalello (talk) 21:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Witold's Report. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100127100332/http://archive.timesonline.co.uk:80/tol/viewArticle.arc?articleId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1948-03-05-03-008&pageId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1948-03-05-03 to http://archive.timesonline.co.uk/tol/viewArticle.arc?articleId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1948-03-05-03-008&pageId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1948-03-05-03

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Name

Three years ago I moved this from Witold's Report to Pilecki's Report with the argument that last name is more informative, but I had second thoughts since. Witold's? Pilecki's? Witold Pilecki's? Also, singular Report or plural Reports? All variants are used, from what I can see in the sources... does anyone else have any preferences? Is there a variant that appears more common than the others? My query results based on GScholar query (note that it is imperfect and can contain occasional errors or unreliable sources/copies):

• "Pilecki's Report": GScholar, 4. "Raport Pileckiego", 8.
• "Pilecki's Reports": Gscholar, 4. "Raporty Pileckiego", 2.
• "Witold's Report": GScholar, 17. "Raport Witolda", 20.
• "Witold's Reports": GScholar, 0. "Raporty Witolda", 2.

This does suggest however, that the singular "Witold's Report" might be the best name. As such, I am reverting my older move and restoring the previous name. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 August 2023

There is a typo.

"underground military of rganization"

should read

"underground military organization" 76.127.55.185 (talk) 16:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done RudolfRed (talk) 01:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)