Talk:Pinoy Dream Academy season 1/GA1

GA Review

Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of September 17, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Much of the article is written in-universe, with little to no explanation of terms and concepts within the program.

2. Factually accurate?: Much of the article has sourcing issues.

3. Broad in coverage?: Lacks production information, does not have a reception section, or any information on viewing statistics/popularity of the program/season.

4. Neutral point of view?: Difficult to tell here because the article does not really have any critique or reception section at all.

5. Article stability? There appear to be lots of unresolved proposals on the article talk page, including a recommendation to split the article into smaller articles, comments about possibly missing information, and confusion about the "Scholars' Grades".

6. Images?: 2 non-free images used in the article, inadequate fair use rationales provided on image pages - I would suggest using {{Non-free use rationale}}.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Cirt (talk) 04:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)