Talk:Pomeranian dog/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:Pomeranian (dog)/GA1)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Casliber in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I will start jotting some notes below. Feel free to revert any inadvertent changes I make. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
pomeranians can also learn quickly how to get what they want- ?? hmm...
- Any time you are not training your dog, s/he is training you. :-) This was on a Pom site, it's better than describing them as 'stubborn' - dogs aren't stubborn, they just want what they want, not what you want, but we can look for a better way of getting the point across. Marj (talk) 04:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Changed to "Pomeranians respond well to firm, consistent obedience training, but otherwise will do what they please.[1]" Marj (talk) 05:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for the rephrase. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Changed to "Pomeranians respond well to firm, consistent obedience training, but otherwise will do what they please.[1]" Marj (talk) 05:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Changed to Arctic Marj (talk) 09:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Count Eberhard zu Sayne --> should this be Sayn?
- Ended up having to check on geneology sites for dates, but certainly this seems to be the same chap. As Sayn is the common usage spelling, I've made the correction. All instances of Sayne on Google are related to this article. Miyagawa (talk) 10:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Overall, nicely done - just tidy up these three little things and I think we're there. Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality: - could buff it a little more but fine for GA
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)