Talk:Precautionary savings
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jackzhp in topic prudence vs. reckless
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The sign of the 3rd derivative
editshould the sign of the 3rd derivative to be negative, rather than positive? Jackzhp (talk) 20:37, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- needed to be positive in order to have precautionary saving (I mistaken this again). if the sign is 0, we can not the preference is not prudent. Jackzhp (talk) 20:41, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
prudence vs. reckless
editwhat if the sign is negative, what is the word for it? reckless?? Jackzhp (talk) 20:52, 16 May 2011 (UTC)