Talk:Boris Saxe-Coburg-Gotha

(Redirected from Talk:Prince Boris, Prince of Tarnovo)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by MaterialWorks in topic Requested move 30 April 2023

Requested move 30 April 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Boris Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. (closed by non-admin page mover)MaterialWorks 01:54, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


Prince Boris, Prince of TarnovoBoris, Prince of Tarnovo – Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility), which states "If an individual holds a princely substantive title, use "{first name}, {title}"." 2601:249:9301:D570:ED46:5CCB:F533:719E (talk) 01:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom. I'll almost always support following WP:NCROY. Estar8806 (talk) 02:20, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Move to Boris Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. See LinkedIn and Instagram (valid sources under WP:ABOUTSELF). Potentially even a name change although I'm not sure whether it's best characterized that way. In any case, sources generally never referred to him as "Prince of Tarnovo". Adumbrativus (talk) 06:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support moving to Boris Saxe-Coburg-Gotha per Adumbrativus. --Killuminator (talk) 14:34, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support moving to Boris Saxe-Coburg-Gotha per Adumbrativus. Also per only source in the article that is actually about him. This article is full of improper synthesis and could simply be deleted. Theoreticalmawi (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support move to Boris Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, we should avoid using defunct titles in the absence of a good reason to the contrary. If that is not accepted, I support the original move request, the use of "prince" looks tautologous. PatGallacher (talk) 23:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.